I had a very strong reaction to the feedback I received from last week’s cube draft and former Pondering author Li Xu’s comment on my associated article. I heard from him and others that my cube needs more combo. I have a strong, innate disagreement with this sentiment, but rather than just reject something I disagree with (which is a bad thing to do), I’d like to do my best to articulate my feelings and position.

To do this, I’ll first need to define what combo is. I think that combo is generally refers to one of two things: combos and combo decks.

(If you disagree with my definitions here, then please respond in the comments with your disagreement and/or definitions. I do not consider myself an expert of all things combo and want to accurately represent and define combo as best as possible. To do any less is to weaken my argument.)


1. A combo is a combination of two or more cards that have a powerful, often game-winning effect. Such combos often, but not always do something an infinite/arbitrarily large number of times. For example:


2. A combo deck is designed to win by assembling a combo (sometimes with a non-combo Plan B). It plays along an unusual axis/doesn’t play ‘normal’ Magic. Oftentimes, but not always, these decks play few to no creatures and have no Plan B. These decks are often, but not always, difficult to interact with (particularly without counterspells, hand disruption, or dedicated hate cards).

It’s worth noting that of these archetypes, Reanimator, Tinker, and Sneak and Show have basically the same end goal (circumventing expensive mana costs of high power creatures) with different engines. This is by no means an exhaustive list of combo decks, but several of them (storm and cheating mana costs) are generally considered staple cube combo deck archetypes.

Azor's Elocutors

3. Lastly, I’d like to define these terms in relation to cube.

  • A combo is a small collection of cards that, if assembled, will have a strong impact on the game. An assembled combo can potentially end the game immediately.
  • A combo deck is one that is dedicated to executing a combo to win. Or rather, you’re not just playing fair Magic. So, I should probably define that, too:
  • Fair Magic is playing creatures, planeswalkers, and/or removal for their mana costs. You’re generally looking to win via damage, usually by attacking with creatures.

Stoneforge Mystic

The Dividing Line between Combo and Synergy

I have a difficult time distinguishing a combo from synergy. Infinite combos that win the game (like Splinter Twin, Vault/Key, and Melira combo) are clearly defined and the cornerstones of archetypes. However, other combos provide a large benefit, but are neither infinite, nor do they immediately end the game. Thopter Foundry + Sword of the Meek, Gifts Ungiven + Unburial Rites, Entomb + Exhume, and Violent Outburst + Living End are very powerful combos, but are neither infinite nor (necessarily) immediately game-winning. How are they distinct from the following combos?

Most of these combinations are definitely weaker than the aforementioned mentioned combos. However, Stoneforge Mystic + Batterskull and Survival of the Fittest + Recurring Nightmare are strong enough to have been banned. All of them rely on synergistic interactions between cards.

We can stretch this definition even further with the following card combinations:

Vent Sentinel

We’ve definitely crossed a line here out of combo and into synergy. Splinter Twin is an obvious combo and the cornerstone of a deck; Vent Sentinel is… better with itself, but not the most powerful interaction. I’d like to try and zero in on where something stops being considered a combo.

We could say that an unanswered combo immediately wins the game, but then Thopter FoundrySword of the Meek, Entomb + Reanimate don’t count. Heck, it’s still possible to lose once you’ve assembled Time Vault + Voltaic Key, since you still need a way to win the game. Many of our obvious combos don’t win the game, at least not immediately. So then, how do we distinguish combo from mere synergy? And what effect, if any, does this have on our definition of combo decks?

We’ll have to wait until next week to dive deeper into this question. I’m going to further explore the distinction between combo and synergy, see how this changes the definition of a combo deck, and argue against the necessity of certain combo decks in cube. Please comment below—I’d love to hear your opinion, position, definitions, or constructive criticism. And, as always, thanks for reading!

—Zachary Barash

Zachary Barash has been playing Magic on and off since 1994. He loves Limited and drafts every available format (including several that aren’t entirely meant to be drafted). He’s a proud Cube owner and improviser, creating entire musicals from scratch every week. Zach has an obsession with Indian food that borders on being unhealthy.

Don't Miss Out!

Sign up for the Hipsters Newsletter for weekly updates.